AI strategy coaches that challenge student thinking across an 8-module case study progression. Not multiple choice. Not auto-grading. Progressive accountability that builds real strategic reasoning.
A professor assigns a 50-page case study. Students submit written analyses. The professor grades them solo. The richest moment in business education disappears between the submission and the grade.
Meaningful written feedback on every student's strategic argument is physically impossible at scale.
Students submit, receive a score, and move on. Nobody asks them to defend their reasoning or consider what they missed.
Each assignment is graded in isolation. Growth across the semester is invisible until final grades.
Core Intelligence turns every case study submission into a strategic conversation. The feedback is personalized, cumulative, and relentless.
Four real-world international business cases spanning superfoods, climate tech, urban mobility, and edtech. Each comes with a full leadership team of AI strategy coaches.
After each module submission, the student's assigned executives provide detailed commentary. Not a score. A strategic dialogue: what works, what's missing, what needs evidence.
By Module 8, coaches reference every previous submission and hold students to the full arc of their strategic reasoning. The system remembers what each student has argued.
Each case study comes with its own executive team. Real names, real roles, distinct perspectives. The CEO pushes on vision. The CFO demands numbers. Operations asks if it's actually feasible.
This is progressive accountability. The system tracks what each student has argued across every submission and raises expectations as they develop. No two students receive the same feedback. No student coasts through the semester.
Coaches help students find their footing. Feedback emphasizes what's working and gently redirects gaps in reasoning.
Standards shift. Coaches expect evidence-backed arguments and begin referencing previous submissions. Vague claims get flagged.
Students must address previous coach recommendations. The system checks whether they incorporated earlier feedback. New rubric criteria enforce it.
The final integration module. Coaches hold students to the complete arc of their strategic reasoning across all 8 modules. This is the defense.
Core Intelligence generates the analytics that accreditation teams, department heads, and provosts ask for. Automatically. Not after a semester of manual data collection.
Student learning outcomes mapped to rubric criteria, exportable and formatted for accreditation review.
Submission patterns, coach interaction frequency, revision behavior. See which students are engaged and which are drifting before midterms.
Score distributions, rubric criterion analysis, and quality trends across the semester. Identify which concepts are landing and which need reinforcement.
Deploy across departments with a template system. Each course gets its own cases, rubrics, and coaching teams. Institutional dashboard aggregates everything.
Currently piloting at Lynn University. Expanding to new departments and institutions for Spring 2027.